http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BlogOneAnother/~3/255944419/worship-
A growing number of people (like Alan Hirsch) are critical of "Jesus is my boyfriend" worship music. Some of the criticism is that it is over-romanticization, even eroticism, and specifically that men feel awkward singing love songs to Jesus, 'cause hey, he's another guy and that's just weird.
I, too, am critical of "Jesus is my boyfriend" but I think I mean something different. What I see is shallow sentimentality, what I call "white bread worship" -- all fluff, no substance. Some of it is certainly shaped by the lyrics of popular songs, because I think the reason they become popular is that they are inoffensive. But I think it goes beyond the songs to the attitude of the worship leader and the way some churches view worship as a means to an end.
Technorati Tags: worship
What is the role of worship, specifically musical worship, in a church gathering? For the "traditional service", it can be overly cerebral. The music itself can be challenging and therefore one must concentrate on getting the notes right. The better lyrics are lofty, beautiful, and stirring; the worse lyrics are so anachronistic that we no longer know what we are singing. (I'm sorry, "Here I raise my Ebenezer" means nothing to me.) The flow of the gathering is herky-jerky: flip to this page, stand up, sing this, sit down, flip to a completely different page. The interspersing of music seems fairly random, interrupting the liturgy.
In contrast, there's the "contemporary service" -- what is the role of musical worship there? It's to set the stage for something else, a transitional device to prepare people for central high point: the sermon. Instead of being cerebral, the focus is on being emotional. Well, one emotion: happiness, the only safe and church-approved emotion there is. The goal is to make people feel good. Worship is evaluated according to whether it "engaged the people," meaning did they stand, sing and clap. And the way you do that is by singing safe songs in the lowest common denominator, and by cheerleading. Oh, and between songs don't forget to say a pointless prayer, again as a transitional device.
I'm probably going to come off as a Vineyard bigot here, but bear with me.
The wide acceptance of "contemporary worship music" is often cited as a success of the Vineyard movement to which most such music can be traced. When my non-Vineyard family members see a church that has a "worship band" with drums, bass, maybe even an electric guitar, they often comment, "Oh, this is just like what you do in the Vineyard, isn't it?"
No. It's not.
The musical forms are simply the surface. What continues to make the Vineyard unique is the underlying values, and especially the value of intimacy with God -- music as a vehicle for meditation, for prayerful surrender, for healing by "doing business with God", for the refocusing of your life on the amazing worthiness of God. Worship is not a means to an end: it is the end, literally. As Keith Green asked, will you be bored in heaven, or will your heart be captivated?
A good worship leader leads the way into this kind of worship by his or her own example, by being transparent, honest and real. When I lead, my goal is to bring myself before God, and in full view of others, rip open my chest to reveal my heart. I want to demonstrate intimacy with God, which feels pretty vulnerable. Yes, it is "a performance" in the sense that any good musician takes their craft seriously. But it is not "a performance" in the sense of putting on a show face. If anything, I am taking off my mask and letting you see a glimpse of what I do in private when I spend time with God and my guitar (or my iPod in the car).
Out of this come songs of honesty, both of pain and adoration. Songs sung, not about God, but to and with God. Something like, "You are beautiful, I love you."
Now take that same song and remove it from those values. You get what I call worship porn -- a shallow copy of the original, with no underlying story of ongoing commitment and interaction with the Holy One that calls for change in your life and effects that change into being. And only one type of emotion. And the point is to achieve that emotion.
In this context, I can understand why there is a backlash from people committed to the transformative power of Christ. When "You are beautiful, I love you," is sung by people who lack good teaching about worship and good examples to guide them, everything changes. The depth those words carry when I say them to my wife of over twenty years is different from the way I said them as an adolescent wanting to have a girlfriend, in love with the concept of being in love.
The words are not the problem. Intimacy is not the problem. If anything, it's a lack of committed intimacy. It's porn.
Let me use a real song example to push the envelope, one that grips my heart:
Let me know the kisses of your mouth
Let me feel your embrace
Let me smell the fragrance of your touch
Let me see your lovely face
Yes, it's erotic: "Take me into the king's chamber"! It is so erotic that most churches won't touch it with a 10-foot pole. Men, if it troubles you to sing that to God, may I suggest that it reveals a weakness in your theology: that God is exclusively a male figure to you. We say God is not male or female, but we really believe it. We are not teaching it, or the implications it has for how to live it out. This is not a bubble-gum adolescent pop song. It is love, adoration, surrender.
Another thing that distinguishes porn from the real thing is that it is about "performance": instead of taking off your mask, you put one on. The emotional range is one-dimensional. In worship porn, everyone is expected to be happy and fulfilled, so the worship leader smiles big and the worshipers pretend that everything is OK. Well, everything is not OK, but songs of pain or doubt from the Vineyard movement haven't caught on in the "contemporary worship" movement. When's the last time you sang
Lord I groan, Lord I kneel
I'm crying out for something real
'Cause I know, deep in my soul
There must be more
or
Whom have I but you
Whom have I but you
Though the mountains fall, they fall into the sea
Though my colored dawn be turned to shades of gray
Though my questions asked should never be resolved
Whom have I but you
Whom have I but you
Such songs are deemed off-putting. I tried singing "When the tears are falling… When I'm all but drowning… I cry a silent prayer that comes out of me" in a church where worship is largely happy-clappy, and it made people uncomfortable. I was told that lament didn't fit the church's culture, or the goal of getting people "engaged" by singing and clapping. (But the people there who are most like my non-church friends said, through tears, that it was the deepest time of worship they'd had in a long time.)
Here's another form of worship porn: Singing songs of sacrificial service, when you're not sacrificially serving. It's not that what you sing has to be true of your own life, because one important function of worship music is singing into being the things we want to be true. But again, there has to be a context of meaning and desire. Here, I totally agree with Mike Frost: Get out and live a life of mission, and your worship will come alive with desperation. Take those same songs and remove them to the safety of a context of personal benefit, and you get people feeling pretty good without actually doing anything. That's like -- well, I've used enough sexual imagery already, so I'd better not say.
Combine these aspects with a style of worship leading which is all about "being just like the recording." The vocal nuances are copied. The arrangement of the song map is set in stone, because "that's the way we practiced it." Perfect those transitions, so there can be no deviation in the song selection itself. These things subtly work together to create an understanding that the purpose of the song is to sing the song. The experience becomes strictly one-way, from the leader to the people, rather than allowing the Holy Spirit to interact with the people and the leader respond to that. Then instead of letting people interact with the music on their own terms, interrupt whatever is going on with prayers or chattiness between songs -- thus inadvertently taking the focus away from "doing business with God" and putting it back on the worship leader.
In such an environment, I started to think that maybe my "heart of worship" had become hard and cold. Then while visiting family, our family got to visit a Vineyard on a Sunday morning. It had been a while since we had been in a Vineyard, and that had been in a different area, so I wasn't too surprised when I didn't know a single song. I was surprised that it didn't matter that I didn't know a single song -- the transparency of the worship leader's heart immediately drew me into a state of worship I had forgotten was possible. I wasn't asked to stand, or sing, or clap -- though most people did those things, I felt no pressure to conform. The leader mostly had his eyes closed and just sang his heart, so it didn't matter that I mostly just let the words wash over me as I stood silently, with tears.
When Kay & I compared notes afterwards, we found it interesting that unfamiliarity with the songs did not pose a barrier to either of us, but that we had had the most spiritual time of worship in years. Maybe it's because we were in an environment where the purpose of the songs wasn't to sing the songs. The underlying Vineyard values may not have been copied by the "contemporary worship" movement, but they are still alive and well in the Vineyard.
Eh, maybe I am just a Vineyard bigot after all.
So back to "Jesus is my boyfriend" -- I'm afraid the "I'm a guy, I don't do that" criticism will lead people to shy away from intimacy in worship. Intimacy is not the problem -- it's that it's too shallow. Divorced from a context of deeper worship values, intimate songs come across as bubble-gum pop or as porn. While some songs are deeper than others, the problem is not the songs but with the context. Even mediocre lyrics can be meaningful when they are sung with meaning.
OK, enough complaining. Here are some biased suggestions:
- Go experience worship in a Vineyard. Part of the Vineyard heritage is to bless non-Vineyard churches, so they will be happy to share their experiences and understanding with you.
- Talk with your pastor. You've got to be together in this.
- Go with your pastor to a Vineyard worship conference. Pay attention to the underlying values.
- Rediscover that God is not male. What are the implications?
- Worship in private. What moves you? Why? What happens as a result?
- Lead people into mission outside of your worship service.
- Work to find (or write!) songs that express the unique call that God has given your church.